The second was a direct boulevard access opening directly onto Haslett Road at the eastern end of the development. The first was an indirect access at the western end of the development, connecting *627 via a stub street, Wood Knoll Drive, to an existing subdivision cul-de-sac, Creekwood Lane, which in turn opens onto Haslett Road. The proposed subdivision plan submitted in connection with the rezoning provided for two access routes to Haslett Road. On December 15, 1987, Meridian Township granted the developer plaintiffs' request to rezone a fifty-three-acre parcel of property north of Haslett Road in Meridian Township for single-family, medium density residential development. We conclude that the local township board of trustees in this case acted within its authority under the SCA and Arrowhead. MSA 26.430(101) et seq., and the scope of such a body's authority to place conditions on the approval of such a plat consistent with this Court's decision in Arrowhead Development Co v Livingston Co Road Comm, 413 Mich 505 322 NW2d 702 (1982). We address in this case the authority of a local governing body to disapprove a proposed subdivision plat pursuant to the Subdivision Control Act (SCA), MCL 560.101 et seq. Wicklund), for Michigan Townships Association and Michigan Municipal League. Oldani), for the defendants.īauckham, Sparks, Rolfe & Thomsen, P.C. Bush), for the plaintiffs.įoster, Swift, Collins & Smith, P.C.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |